Saturday 28 May 2011

Fennesz, Philip Jeck, and Old Apparatus

at St Pancras Parish Church, Friday 20 May 2011

St Pancras Parish Church provided a fitting backdrop for this evening’s artists;  its towering ceilings and marble columns, offset by the closeness of its mezzanine galleries, combined to create a space that imparted an imposing Georgian grandeur, yet with a sense of intimacy and warmth. 

First up were Old Apparatus, recent additions to Mala’s Deep Medi label, who gave a remarkably assured performance in what was only their third ever live show. 

Moving effortlessly between sonic themes with subtlety and poise, sounds would emerge, shift ground, and then recombine to coalesce into something new.  Distant rumbles, clicks and whirs, sinister hollow waves.  The listener would at points become suddenly aware that they had with been transported from a hazy dronescape, into a track with a powerful two-step beat, without quite knowing how, like a child being lifted from a car whilst asleep.

Despite a scarcity of explicit drum loops or bass lines, the audience’s active attention was held constantly by an innate sense of musicality, a pervading sense of rhythm and sonic cohesion.  In this way, Old Apparatus managed to pick out a delicate path between all-out asbtract drone, and something more akin to dubstep;   by carving out this space predominantly through the interweaving and development of different textures, the possibility of melody seemed almost crass.

One of the most interesting points in set was when a cacophony of unimagined factory assembly-lines emerge, with enough rhythm to satisfy rather than jar, but with enough robot complexity to make it tantalisingly difficult for the listener to pin down whether or not it forms exactly a ‘beat’. 

The music was tied together by visual projections, which were controlled live onstage.  But this was not the drab Winamp-skin wallpaper that is familiar to so many electronic artists - rather, it was deployed as an extra instrument.  Harsh arrays of sounds - metallic clacks, hisses, howls and clangs - suddenly swing sharply into cognitive focus, when imagery is introduced containing pistons, crank-shafts, jets of steam. 

And while this example may read on paper as a rather obvious juxtaposition, its effect is powerful.  This is particularly so in the case of the piston episode, because of the introduction of the image after the musical scene has already been set.  It feels somewhat like a naming of your extant but unspoken thought, in the same way that Doris Lessing describes the seductive potential of your character being ‘named’ by a suitor:  pinning down a vague sense that you had already been incubating but not assigned a category to, and haven’t even realised you have been incubating until this revelatory point. 

These hauntological motifs of Old Apparatus operate in the same territory as a Magnus Mills creation, or the creature in Wallace and Gromit’s ‘Grand Day Out’ – the figure is unknown, does not belong to an identifiable category, yet speaks to a half-understood aesthetic sensibility that sits just on the tip of the tongue; a semi-formed childhood memory; an itch that cannot be located.  Mark Fisher has described this unattainability as “The sonic equivalent of the 'corner of the retina' effect that the best ghost stories have famously achieved”.  Quatermass groans emanate from the boiler room of a Ballardian nightmare;  a Cronenberg photocopier stalks Jacob Epstein shadows across the derelict corridors of a Victorian workhouse. 


Philip Jeck contrasted the previous set with warm analogue tones, like butter melting on crumpets, his sound constructed entirely from live vinyl sampling and effects.

This was a more stately affair than the previous act, Jeck allowing himself time to linger over passages, savouring smooth trains of sound that extended over periods of several minutes, their momentum carried along by only the most delicate of tweaks.

As well as a suspicion that this is something that arrives with the confidence and comfortableness that arrives with age, there is an element of the sonic output here that arises from the physical apparatus of his methods.  While it may smack of generalisation and nostalgia, there is something intuitively calming about seeking out suitable records, homing in on just a few seconds-worth of material, and expanding on them for extended periods, experimenting to bring new perspectives the fore.  In the dexterity and care required to manipulate the vinyl, imperceptibly adjusting dials to hone their form like a woodturner, slowly yielding a pulsating seascape of sound.  

This suggestion could seem to be merely a fetishisation of ‘retro’ technology.  It is also tempting to dismiss the ‘calmness’ notion by pointing to flaring among turntablists.   We could also argue that vinyl sampling was merely a precursor to the ‘shuffle button’ generation, flitting through Youtube amputations like ADHD butterflies. 

But Jeck’s approach  is surely the antithesis of Youtube surfing.  Because, whereas Simon Reynolds writes about the effects of the proliferation of the world’s music at the click of a mouse making for commodification and ephemerality, Jeck’s music takes a small, carefully selected nugget and considers it, examines it, and (crucially) prolongs it over time – swimming against the current of the attenuation of our collective attention spans.


Christian Fennesz began his set in the well-trodden territory of effects-laden guitar loops.  It was pleasant;  but for all the fuzz and delay, he never managed to lift this element of his performance above the prosaic, and the set really stepped up a notch when he put down the guitar and picked up the laptop, and began to work from a broader palette.

The performance contained extensive passages of sublime mastery of his material, with overlapping themes sculpted and embellished upon.  His peak moment was when he stripped away all of the layers to zoom in on a single tone, which he then manipulated for several minutes, exploring its possibilities in detail, before re-expanding the scene by re-building the structure from the ground up. 

But, lacking the assured consistency of Jeck’s work, Fennesz hopped between sounds too readily, with an uneven, plum-pudding assortment of tricks.  Like the Robert Green of drone, you could never tell when he would rudely intrude upon your reverie with a too-obvious transition, or a pre-heated Ikea synth line. 

Fennesz established an even keel in the final third of the set though, with floating, glassy waves that approached something of a digital Jeck.  This was a thoroughly satisfying conclusion to the evening, as we were enveloped by a luxuriantly textured fog;  a modernist lullaby;  a cold, yet soothing ambience that moulded perfectly to the flagstones and oak of our surroundings. 

Wednesday 4 May 2011

Osama bin Laden

Casting my eye around today’s newspaper front pages, all of which announced yesterday’s death of Osama bin Laden, I wasn’t surprised to see some pretty salty headlines.  Though I do admit to being slightly surprised that quite so many were quite so extreme. 

While the New York Times demurely stated, ‘Bin Laden killed by US forces in Pakistan, Obama says, declaring justice has been done’, its city-mate the New York Post opted for the more striking ‘Got him!  Vengeance at last!  US nails the bastard'.  Called me old fashioned, but… two exclamation marks, and a swear-word, before your cornflakes?

The Chicago Sun-Times simply had ‘Dead’, while the Salt Lake Tribune subtly improved on this with ‘Dead.’  -  the finality of the full-stop giving a sense of closure, I feel.  Back in Blighty, wags at The Sun hit upon ‘Bin Bagged’.  Not to be outdone, and probably winning the award for the most unpleasant headline of the day, was the Daily News, with ‘Rot in hell’. 

Finally, I also stumbled upon David Icke’s website, which contains what appears to be an out-of-date reference to a much older story – claiming as it does that, ‘Osama bin Laden has been dead for years’.

But beyond the lurid front pages, the really surprising thing was that no news source I’ve seen has pointed out the fact that the operation was completely illegal from start to finish.


Invasion of Pakistan
The US military has been using unmanned drones to carry out unauthorised airstrikes in Pakistan for a number of years now, which not only demonstrate America’s hypocritical disdain for national sovereignty, but have killed hundreds of innocent civilians.  Until recently, complaints from the Pakistani authorities have been minimal, for two reasons – to maintain good relations with the US, and to avoid looking pathetic at home.  But over the last year, they’ve been increasingly vocal in their criticism of bombing raids on their soil.  

Yet in the aftermath of the Bin Laden operation, the latest of these strikes, the US army has remained unapologetic in confirming that the Pakistani government wasn’t even informed it was going to happen, let alone consulted about its planning.

To add insult to injury, one main strand of commentary to emerge over the last 24 hours – notably espoused by John Simpson on the BBC news – has been that serecy from Pakistan was justified, on the grounds that the situation raises implications of Pakistani incompetence, or even complicity in Bin Laden’s hiding. 

Assassination
Even in Iraq, that other great military adventure conducted in the face of the law, Saddam Hussein was captured and put on trial.  (Whatever citicisms people may have had regarding the legal process and the execution.) 

By contrast, in the bin Laden case, a summary execution was conducted by soldiers - and so brutally, that the photographs of body are too "gruesome" to be released.  No attempt was made to bring him to even the pretence of justice, despite the fact that the US army state he was unarmed when they found him.

Body dumped
The army has stated that his body was ‘buried at sea’, but with no apparent explanation.  According to a cursory look through an atlas, the assassination was about 800 miles from the nearest sea.  This means that it was in no way a convenient place to put him, but a deliberate mafia-style dumping. 

While it makes tactical sense (more on ‘tactics’ later) that no one would want a martyr's grave on their hands, this does seem an extraordinary move.  To kill someone without an arrest or a trial, and then to conceal the body without a coroner’s report is just plain suspicious.

Capitalist Realism
Mark Fisher’s 2009 book, 'Capitalist Realism', argues that in order to maintain a façade of credibility, capitalism requires the abstract character of the ‘referrent Other’ to believe its own lies.  Even if everyone knows that the system is mad and wrong, order can be maintained as long as no powerful figure publicly acknowledges this fact. 

For example, it doesn't matter that everyone knows the Blair government lied to us over Iraq, and that it was a war for oil - as long as no one in government admits that they lied, or that the war was indeed for oil.  As soon as someone admits the truth however, all hell will break loose – even though everyone knew the score already. 

Despite this, it does seem that governments these days are starting to ignore this code of conduct, and are becoming more blasé.  We are increasingly told: “Hello!  We’ve done something outrageous!  And we don’t care whether you like it or not!”  Increasingly it seems to be that powerful nations justify their actions on the basis of their tactical or even financial benefits, as opposed to whether they stand up to legal or moral scrutiny. 

Dario Fo once wrote of the ‘cultural burp’ – the state’s momentary acceptance of liability for some misdemeanour or other, which acts as a release-valve to alleviate a build-up of public anger, permitting a controlled outburst of rage, hence allowing normal service to resume the following week.  But Fo's momentary 'cultural burp' is slowly being replaced with a permanently open valve – a continuous admission, a perpetual ‘I-dare-you’ – which has the effect of a pressure hose on the synapses, numbing individuals to the extent that they can no longer express rage – merely bewilderment. 

After all, it is difficult to offer any other response, to a government which openly declares, "We're going to assassinate whoever we like, wherever we want to, no matter who gets trampled in the process, because it suits us, and because we can - and you can't stop us."

It is this brazen-ness that makes modernity so crazy-making, so exasperating, and so frequently beyond parody.  Satirical website The Onion today ran with the headline ‘Osama Bin Laden:  death of a motherfucker’.  When the spoof headline is milder than, and on the same plane of discourse as, dozens of real newspaper headlines, the world has surely eaten itself.